5 Comments

I'd say that in the cyber security sense, the paper authors should have done a responsible disclosure to the ejmr security team or not. But to publish a "zero-day" is not ethical.

Expand full comment

Still reading the first section and Christ.

The people who posted those screenshots should be outed and their employers alerted

Expand full comment

People have been publishing anonymously or pseudonymously since publishing happened. I refuse to believe no one's written about the morals of revealing the real name behind a pamphlet. Nor do I see how that and doxxing differ, in terms of morality.

Expand full comment

I think a somewhat-related issue that comes up from time-to-time is whether social media sites should require verification somehow, and it has all the same thorny questions and predictable edge cases one would expect. I can say that for me, I use my real name (or first and last initial) because man is a fallen creature, as the saying goes, and using my real name keeps me honest about the stuff I say online.

That said, I think this falls into the same peril as one of your examples for doxxing, right? I'm fortunate enough to live in a country and have a work environment where I don't really have to worry about either entity coming after me for my lukewarm hot takes, but in a different context I can imagine where I would value that anonymity.

ETA: Typo

Expand full comment